DNA is considered a definitive means of identification: True or False?

DNA is widely regarded as a definitive means of identification due to its unique genetic markers that can be matched to individuals with high precision. Each person, with the exception of identical twins, has a distinct DNA profile, which makes it an extremely reliable form of identification in various contexts, including criminal investigations, paternity tests, and identifying remains.

However, there can be scenarios where DNA analysis may not provide a conclusive identification. Factors such as contamination of samples, insufficient quantity of DNA, or the presence of multiple contributors (as in cases with mixed DNA profiles) can complicate analysis and lead to ambiguous results. These limitations mean that while DNA is a powerful tool, it may not always serve as a definitive answer in every case. Thus, saying that DNA is outright a definitive means of identification does not take into account the complexities and potential challenges involved in specific situations.